The rich “take the knee”

Bill Bonner’s Diary

The Rich "Take the Knee"

By Bill Bonner

Wednesday, August 19, 2020 – Week 23 of the Quarantine

Bill Bonner

SAN MARTIN, ARGENTINA – “The cattle are gone.”

Our office window looks out on the pasture. Yesterday, there were 120 cows in the field. This morning, none.

Yesterday, we had heard some moaning in the field. Calves were separated from their mothers. Neither mothers nor calves were happy about it.

But this moaning was a little different. Strange. Unsettling. Like something was seriously wrong. We didn’t know what to make of it.

This morning, we found out.

Bad News

“I’ve got some bad news, Boss,” said the foreman.

“We lost two cows yesterday. So we moved the whole herd out of the pasture last night.”

“What happened?”

“These were the cows that just came down from the ranch. We shouldn’t have left them in the alfalfa. It was too rich for them.

“We’re putting them back now… But we’re keeping a closer eye on them.”

We explained that we had heard an odd-sounding moaning coming from the field.

“Oh… yes… That’s what it was… They eat the alfalfa. They’re not used to it. It blows up in their intestines, blocking the normal flow. They swell up and die.

“When you hear them crying out like that, you need to get a sharp knife and go out and find the cow. You stick the knife right into the stomach. Make sure you puncture the intestines so the gas can get out.”

“Ok…”

The FINAL Wave of 5G Millionaires Starts Any Day Now.

image
Cows coming back into the alfalfa

Chanting Crowd

Meanwhile…

The Washington Post reports:

The coronavirus recession is over for the rich, but the working class is far from recovered

U.S. stocks are hovering near a record high, a stunning comeback since March that underscores the new phase the economy has entered: The wealthy have mostly recovered. The bottom half remain far from it.

This dichotomy is evident in many facets of the economy, especially in employment. Jobs are fully back for the highest wage earners, but fewer than half the jobs lost this spring have returned for those making less than $20 an hour, according to a new labor data analysis by John Friedman, an economics professor at Brown University and co-director of Opportunity Insights.

What’s that noise in the background… down the street? Is that a crowd chanting, “Eat the rich… Eat the rich…”?

Small Price to Pay

When people come to think that the “system” is unfair… it’s not long before things get ugly. Yahoo! Finance reports that the Democrats are sharpening their knives:

Biden’s tax plans have been analyzed by a range of groups, including the American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution. A combination of multiple analyses found that Biden’s plans would mean that the richest Americans would see their taxes go up by 13% to 18%.

Americans of more moderate means would also see tax increases, but they have been called “indirect” and amount to a smaller increase: around 0.2% to 0.6%.

A President Biden would push for higher taxes on people making more than $400,000 a year for both payroll taxes and capital gains. It takes an income of $538,926 to be among the top 1% of earners nationwide.

A 13% tax increase seems like a small price to pay for all the bounty delivered to the rich by the feds over the last 30 years.

Rich people own financial assets – stocks, bonds, and commercial real estate, for example. They get richer not just from fat paychecks, but also when those assets go up in value.

And over the last three decades, the Federal Reserve has made it its business to make sure those assets keep going up in value.

The 1990s began with the Dow at almost exactly one-tenth of today’s level. Which means the rich multiplied their wealth – as measured by the Dow – by nearly 10 times over the last three decades.

That gain – in terms of the wealth it represented – was worth about $7.5 trillion (based on the increase in the market cap of the Dow stocks).

Or, divided by the top 10% of the population, it meant a gain of about $1 million for every family of four.

During that same time, the median household income went from $35,000 to $78,000 – a gain of just a bit more than two times.

Why the big difference in outcomes? How come the rich got so much richer while most not-so-rich people barely kept pace with inflation?

This Revolutionary Tech IS the #1 Investment of the Century.

Implicit Guarantee

There were probably many causes. But the one that stands out is that the Fed was backing the stock market with an implicit guarantee (the Greenspan Put): If prices fell, the Fed was there to push them back up.

This flimflam got underway after the crash of 1987. It then became progressively bolder following the Nasdaq crash of 2000… the mortgage finance crash of 2008… and finally, the COVID-19 crash of 2020.

What this shows is that the Fed’s efforts at inflation work fairly well when applied to the capital markets. There are only so many stocks, bonds, and commercial properties. When the Fed puts more money into the Wall Street economy, in classic style, that money chases up assets, raising prices.

What else can investors do with the money?

(In the Main Street economy, however, inflation is more complicated. Not only can the feds not really increase GDP growth… they can’t reliably induce consumer price inflation either. But we’ll get to that tomorrow…)

Not About the Money

Meanwhile, the gap between the rich and the not-rich is attracting more and more claptrap. Much like white people trying to atone for their whiteness, rich people are now trying to save their necks by joining the sans-culottes.

Here’s a Guardian article from last month:

A group of 83 of the world’s richest people have called on governments to permanently increase taxes on them and other members of the wealthy elite to help pay for the economic recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.

The super-rich members, including Ben and Jerry’s ice cream co-founder Jerry Greenfield and Disney heir Abigail Disney, called on “our governments to raise taxes on people like us. Immediately. Substantially. Permanently.”

Of course, there is nothing to stop any of them from sending the feds more money. No change in tax law needed.

But it’s not really about the money.

In effect, these mega-rich people were the major recipients of property stolen from the public. And now, they are so filthy rich that the marginal utility of an incremental dollar is almost zero.

Bless their gold-plated hearts, they “take the knee”… and hope the mobs will spare them.

What they are after now is status, prestige, and social approval..

And now, they can buy it with the public’s money!

Regards,

signature

Bill


Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to feedback@rogueeconomics.com.


MAILBAG

Praise today for Bill’s “Fireside Chat”

Hurray! Finally, someone who put on paper exactly what I have been wanting our president to do and say! This whole thing has gone beyond ridiculous! It has been insane, asinine, cowardly, moronic, idiotic, stupid, etc. (As none of these adjectives convey the actual depth of contempt that is needed, we need to make up a new word that encapsulates all these adjectives, but with more intensity in the meaning!)

History, written by truthful historians, will be sneering, scornful, and contemptuous when writing about this generation and its response to this nonsense. Losing our freedoms because we are in fear of nature is the epitome of stupidity. I think it was Benjamin Franklin who said that if we give up our liberty for security (or “safety” as it were in this case), we deserve neither liberty nor security/safety.

This whole fiasco has been a hoax right from the beginning and someone, like the president, needs to yell, “The emperor has no clothes!” Thank you, Bill, for your emails. I really enjoy your insight, especially when accompanied by your witty sarcasm. I always get a good laugh out of them. Please don’t stop writing.

– Mindy C.

Bill, I wish the President would have this “Fireside Chat.” You’ve outlined exactly as you’ve written it. Particularly as the “COVID-19” risk has been blown up far and away beyond all reasonable likelihood. The President’s own actions have resulted – due to his promise of $39,000 to all medical centers, clinics, and hospitals who diagnose the disease in anyone who shows up at these facilities – in a huge spike in the reported incidence of infections.

These facilities have been financially incentivized to diagnose COVID infections. And so the highest rate of reported infections are in the states where the weather alone would have destroyed the virus on surfaces, since heat temperatures above 90 degrees are the most powerful way to kill any virus. That's why the human body raises its temperature to 102, 103 or 104 degrees when any viral infection occurs. It doesn’t take a genius to see the result.

– Steve M.

I was interested in reading your “Fireside Chat” on COVID. Back in March, when all the government clamp-down started, I was very much in agreement with your proposed response.

That changed when I saw how many people ended up on ventilators in ICUs. Many ended up there for weeks, or even months, before dying or being released. Even though the COVID death rate is small, and possibly within “acceptable” limits, the impact on medical facilities and staff from the virus is too great to allow a response like that of Sweden, largely due to our very large population.

And, of course, there are many who would disagree with your idea that everyone has to die from something eventually. They think that the death of a 90-year-old in a nursing home from COVID is so detestable that it must be avoided at all costs. Death of the same person from cancer or heart problems, though, is OK.

– John C.

Other dear readers offer their perspectives on COVID-19…

Let the working world, businesses, and students get back to LIVING again! I am 78 and my husband is soon to be 80. We both survived COVID during the month of July. We had very challenging issues and used all the recovering tools we could tap into for recovery… at home, of course! We had one VERY important advantage… We are both very “fit” and healthy.

Thank you for your insights and boldness of writing the truth. I think all of us at any age can spread the word and keep a perfectly good country going forward. I may be older, but I still have a responsibility to my children, grandchildren, and generations to come.

– Jan H.

Love Bill’s amateur attempt at epidemiology. Sweden tried the “keep it open” approach. It resulted in 10 times the number of deaths as neighboring countries. And their GDP suffered a 10% decline. When comparing your 0.1% U.S. death rate to flu, keep in mind, that’s the result of months of closures, mask wearing, and social distancing. Without those actions, we might have experienced a rate closer to the 1918 Spanish flu.

I don’t disagree with you, however, regarding the need to protect the elderly – they represent some 40% of all COVID deaths. The trouble began when unprotected relatives and facility staff co-mingled with them. It was exacerbated when infected seniors were denied ICU beds and treatment. This was a disgrace in the U.S., as it was in Sweden. A society must be judged by how well it treats its most vulnerable.

– Peter A.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT…

TEEKA: "The Truth Is Ugly"

Wall Street duped Main Street during the tech boom in 1995. And now, Teeka says they're trying to do it again as the biggest IPO boom in 25 years kicks into high gear… and unlocks the opportunity to turn as little as $250 into a nest egg on IPO day.

You are NOT going to want to see the ugly truth…

But you need to see it today.

image


Get Instant Access

Click to read these free reports and automatically sign up for daily research.

image

How You Can Start Profiting From Maganomics Today

image

How to Make A Fortune From Legal Cannabis

image

Trading Basics: Two Building Blocks Every Trader MUST Know

Rogue Economics
55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483
www.rogueeconomics.com

Share FACEBOOK
Tweet TWITTER

To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please add our email address to your address book.

This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to phanhoa1821960.trader@blogger.com because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click here.

Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice.

To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us here.

© 2020 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

No comments:

Post a Comment