My 500 Second View of the Coronavirus Dear Daily Prophecy Reader, Mark Twain offered the crucial inverse rule of time and expertise: "A genuine expert can always foretell a thing that is 500 years away easier than he can a thing that's only 500 seconds off." A "panel of experts" predicting doom can attain the certainty of infinitude. Sorry folks, I'm going to give in and write another prophecy on the coronavirus. Like many of us I get up in the morning and read about it, and as time passes I gain an illusion of expertise. It is borrowed expertise. But having watched scores of experts' YouTube videos and blog posts expounding their views on the crisis, I feel ready to give a report from the online wilderness. I descry an increasingly high–resolution mirage of cumulative medical and political insight. As the illusion swells, my fingers itch, and my readers cringe! My doctor daughter chastises me fiercely. My Chinese friend Habi writes me off. But not being a genuine expert, I can offer the 500 second view. That means that by the time you read this the prophesied event will have already happened. I figure that to people who are fain to accept it, the truth on the coronavirus will become obvious fairly soon. So, I compensate for my lack of Twain's genuine expertise by predicting an event that is essentially over by the time you read this. That is, the crisis of the epidemic will be over, and it will become merely our chronic political crisis. It will become a crisis of narrative rather than a crisis of knowledge. The Experts Weigh in The two experts I have found most knowledgeable and convincing are William "Matt" Briggs, who earned a PhD in statistics from Cornell and taught there, and Rockefeller University and German epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski. To my innocent ears, learned in economics, technology, and information theory, these two voices in the wilderness evoke a mirage of conviction and an oasis of truth. They lead me to what I will distill as ten propositions. Since I am neither statistician nor epidemiologist nor professor nor politician, nor any chimerical combination of the above, I can oversimplify their arguments without violating any academic or professional norms. - COVID–19 is just another respiratory virus like many others. Fearsome death rates are a function of testing biased toward acute cases and asymptomatic spread of the disease which lowers the denominator. The tests are flawed by false positives and false negatives. Asymptomatic spread is speculative in the absence of antibody surveys that measure immunity.
- All respiratory viruses end through herd immunity, whether through direct exposure or artificial vaccination.
- Social distancing, closed schools, and obsessive masking prolong the epidemic and ensure a second peak comparable to the first. By flattening the curve, they widen it and thus render it more menacing to more people.
- The more that young people get exposed, the better. They are the vessel of herd immunity. Closing schools delays the immunity and tends to expose vulnerably old and frail grandparents in the home.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment